Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure

The lawsuit says Thinx underwear, long marketed as safe and sustainable, contains harmful chemical substances known as PFAS. The company denies those allegations but will pay up to $5 million.

Thinx period underwear settles class action lawsuit over possibly causing fertility issues

Um, Should I Throw Out My Thinx?! - Betty's Co.

Thinx Underwear Lawsuit Settlement; What You Need to Know

Fighting Forever Chemicals in Menstrual Products, by Leveled Legislation, Leveled Legislation

Thinx period underwear was supposed to be 'non-toxic'. Now customers feel betrayed, Menstruation

Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS

Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR

Best PFAS-Free Period Underwear Brands • Organically Becca

Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS

Thinx PFAS Lawsuit: Is Period Underwear Safe? : StyleWise - Sustainable Fashion & Living

You can get $100 in cash back in $5million settlement by major underwear brand - exact date you need to claim

You can get $100 in cash back in $5million settlement by major underwear brand - exact date you need to claim

There's WHAT in my underwear? - No Kill Mag

Thinx, EZPawn, Utz, other class action settlement checks in the mail - Top Class Actions